Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
  •  This submission has not previously been published and has not been sent to other journals for consideration (or the comments for the editor below provide the necessary explanations).
  •  The submission file is a document in Microsoft Word, OpenOffice, RTF or WordPerfect format.
  •  Internet links in the text are accompanied by fully valid URLs.
  •  The text is typed in the 12th font size with a single line spacing; authorial accents are highlighted in italics, not underlined (except URLs); all illustrations, graphs and tables are placed directly in the text, where they should be in the table of contents (not at the end of the document).
  •  The text meets the stylistic and bibliographic requirements that were set the categories “About the Journal” and “Author's Guide”.
  •  If the material is submitted to a peer-reviewed section of the journal, the guidelines for Blind Review Guarantees have been followed while compiling the submission file.
  • Confirm that the manuscript has been created by the author(s) and not an AI tool/Large Language Model (LLM). If an AI tool/LLM has been used to develop or generate any portion of the manuscript, then this must be clearly flagged in the Methods and Acknowledgements.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors hold copyright immediately after publication of their works and retain publishing rights without any restrictions.
  2. The copyright commencement date complies the publication date of the issue, where the article is included in.

Privacy Statement

Confidentiality

Copyright protection

Reviewers are informed that the manuscripts submitted are the intellectual property of the authors and belong to the information that is not subject to disclosure. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the peer-reviewed article or use the materials of the article before it is published.

Reviewing is based on confidentiality, when information about the article (terms of receipt, content, stages and features of reviewing, reviewers' comments and the final decision on publication) is not communicated to anyone but the authors and reviewers. Violation of this requirement is possible only in the presence of signs or allegations of inaccuracy or falsification of the materials of the article. With the consent (desire) of the authors and reviewers, the reviewers' comments may be published together with the article. In any case, the author of the peer-reviewed work is given the opportunity to read the text of the review, in particular if he does not agree with the conclusions of the reviewer.