Journal Editorial Policy

REVIEW PROCEDURE

All articles submitted to the editorial board are reviewed. The review procedure is focused on the most objective assessment of the content of the scientific article, determination of its compliance with the journal's requirements, and involves a comprehensive analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the article's materials. Only those articles that are valuable from a scientific point of view and contribute to the solution of current educational problems and tasks are accepted for publication.

REVIEW PROCESS

  1. The author submits to the editorial board an article that meets the requirements of the collection policy and the rules for preparing articles for publication. Manuscripts that do not meet the accepted requirements are not allowed for further consideration, and their authors are notified.
  2. Checking the article for anti-plagiarism. For all articles submitted for review, the degree of uniqueness of the author's text is determined using appropriate software.
  3. The responsible secretary conducts a preliminary evaluation of the articles received by the editors, their compliance with the content of the profile and the subject matter of the collection, sends them for review
  4. All materials that have passed the editorial review are sent to 2 independent reviewers.
  5. The reviewer, as a rule, makes a conclusion about the possibility of printing the article within 14 days. The review terms may change in each individual case, taking into account the creation of conditions for the most objective assessment of the quality of the submitted materials, but should not exceed 1 calendar month.
  6. The review is provided to the author(s) in printed form. The review can also be sent by e-mail with a notification that the message has been read. At the same time, confirmation by the author (authors) of the receipt of the review is considered a fact of familiarization.
  7. The author of the article can imagine a motivated disagreement with the results of the review. The decision on further review of the article is made by the responsible editor or deputy responsible editor.
  8. In case of agreement with the comments of the reviewer, the authors of the article have the right to make changes to it and submit the article again. Authors are encouraged to also submit a written response to the reviewer's comments. At the same time, the review procedure is repeated. The date of receipt of the article to the editorial office is considered to be the date of its last submission after editing.

With minor comments that require only editorial corrections, and with the consent of the authors, a decision can be made to accept the article for publication.

 

The main goal of the review procedure is to eliminate cases of poor quality research practices and to ensure coordination and balance of interests of authors, readers, editorial board, reviewers and the institution where the research was conducted. The reviewers evaluate the theoretical and methodological level of the article, its practical value and scientific significance. In addition, the reviewers determine the compliance of the article with the principles of ethics in scientific publications and provide recommendations for eliminating cases of their violation.

 

Copyright protection

Reviewers are informed that the manuscripts sent by them are the intellectual property of the authors and are classified as non-disclosure information. Reviewers are not allowed to make copies of the article submitted for review or use the materials of the article before its publication.

Reviewing takes place on the basis of confidentiality, when information about the article (receipt terms, content, stages and features of review, comments of reviewers and the final decision on publication) is not communicated to anyone except the authors and reviewers. Violation of this requirement is possible only if there are signs or a statement regarding the unreliability or falsification of the article materials. With the consent (desire) of the authors and reviewers, reviewers' comments may be printed together with the article. In any case, the author of the reviewed work is given the opportunity to familiarize himself with the text of the review, in particular if he does not agree with the conclusions of the reviewer.

 

Frequency of publication

Professional edition "Pedagogical education: theory and practice. Psychology. Pedagogy" is published twice a year.

Articles are accepted continuously.