Modern tools of corporate pedagogy and personnel development

Authors

  • V. Zhelanova Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Professor in the Department of Educational Studies and Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences at the Faculty of Teacher Education of the Boris Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9467-1080
  • I. Leontieva Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor in the Department of Educational Studies and Psychological and Pedagogical Sciences at the Faculty of Teacher Education, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8084-1912

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2409.2026.452

Keywords:

L&D, corporate education, corporate pedagogy, personnel development, corporate training methodology, corporate university ecosystem

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive theoretical and methodological analysis and systematization
of key trends and contemporary tools for employee learning and development that shape the landscape
of corporate education in 2026. The relevance of the study is driven by the strategic transition of corporate
pedagogy from an auxiliary human resource management function to the status of a key driver of organizational
adaptability and competitiveness. It is substantiated that the modern business education ecosystem is based
on four fundamental principles: continuity, personalization of development trajectories, transformation
of thinking, and deep integration of learning into operational business processes, ensuring the immediate
conversion of knowledge into performance.
The aim of the article is to systematize the toolkit of corporate pedagogy and outline the prospects for its
implementation to optimize personnel development systems under conditions of rapid digitalization. The research
is based on a set of scientific methods, including a systematic review of the source base, content analysis of current
corporate strategies of leading companies, data visualization methods, and theoretical generalization.
The paper systematizes and provides a detailed characterization of key tools across six functional blocks: digital
intelligent platforms and the role of generative artificial intelligence as the main driver of learning individualization;
needs assessment (TNA) and multi-level models for evaluating the effectiveness of investments in learning; flexible
formats (microlearning, gamification, social and flipped learning); immersive technologies for technical training
and onboarding; workplace learning (coaching, mentoring, shadowing, job rotation); integrated knowledge
transfer models (the “Science to Business” model) and best European practices of interdisciplinary collaboration
between universities and business.
The study concludes on the multidimensional nature of modern corporate pedagogy as a strategic investment
in human capital. Prospects for further research are identified, related to the empirical measurement of technology
effectiveness and the analysis of the transformative impact of AI on the development of professional competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

REFERENCES

Decius J., Kortsch T., Paulsen H., Schmitz A. Learning what you really, really want: towards a conceptual

framework of new learning in the digital work environment. Proceedings of the 55th HI International

Conference on System Sciences. 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.637.

Future of Jobs Report 2023. World Economic Forum, Geneva, 2023. 296 p.Gudoniene, D., Staneviciene, E., Huet, I., Dickel, J., Dieng, D., Degroote, J., Rocio, V., Butkiene, R., &

Casanova, D. (2025). Hybrid Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review.

Sustainability, 17(2), 756. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17020756

Hardman P. From Experimentation to Everyday: How AI Is Transforming L&D AI in Learning

& Development Report 2026. Synthesia, 2026. URL: https://webcdn.synthesia.io/reports/AI%20in%20

Learning%20and%20Development%20Report%202026.pdf

Hybrid learning spaces — Design, data, didactics / A. Cohen et al. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2020. Vol. 51.

P. 1039-1044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12964.

Li Q, Li Z, Han J. A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19

pandemic in the performing arts education. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2021; 26(6):7635-7655. doi:

10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1. Epub 2021 Jun 28. PMID: 34220284; PMCID: PMC8236386

Making lifelong learning a reality: a handbook. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning, 2022. DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54675/FWWE9277.

Micro-credentials supporting flexible higher education and lifelong learning. European University

Association, 2021. URL: https://www.eua.eu/publications/policy-input/micro-credentials-supporting-flexiblehigher-

education-and-lifelong-learning.html (дата звернення: 19.04.2026).

Nørgård R. T. Theorising hybrid lifelong learning. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2021.

Vol. 52(4). P. 1709-1723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13121.

Pahos N., Galanaki E., van der Heijden B. I. J. M. Multi-level effects of human resource bundles

on the performance of aging employees. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2024. Vol. 35(2). P. 165–

188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21501.

The Digital Transformation of Business Model Innovation: A Structured Literature Review / S. Vaska

et al. Front. Psychol. 2021. Vol. 11:539363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.539363

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Zhelanova , V., & Leontieva, I. (2026). Modern tools of corporate pedagogy and personnel development. Pedagogical Education: Theory and Practice. Psychology. Pedagogy, (45(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2409.2026.452

Issue

Section

Theoretical foundations of development of modern pedagogy

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>